Closed tekul closed 1 year ago
interesting ... probably adding a "sort" in the test should fix the issue.
I have the same issue when building some project with cabal+nix. Apparently, you had already fixed the tests about 6 months ago (https://github.com/agrafix/Spock/commit/eac4cc3202f8bcb87ec317ca17d7ef96f50907ca) but it hasn't made its way to Hackage yet.
In the meantime, someone might be interested in the following workaround.
{ nixpkgs ? import <nixpkgs> {}, compiler ? "default" }:
let
inherit (nixpkgs) pkgs;
haskellPackages = if compiler == "default"
then pkgs.haskellPackages
else pkgs.haskell.packages.${compiler};
reroute = haskellPackages.callPackage
({ mkDerivation, base, criterion, deepseq, graph-core, hashable
, hspec, http-api-data, hvect, mtl, random, regex-compat, text
, unordered-containers, vector, stdenv
}:
mkDerivation {
pname = "reroute";
version = "0.4.1.0";
sha256 = "02159ifmv1i5y2dkh9927rw5b0kssxcjiw37d0z0nqa0086kza1l";
doCheck = false; # <--- Don't run the tests
libraryHaskellDepends = [
base deepseq hashable http-api-data hvect mtl text
unordered-containers
];
testHaskellDepends = [
base hspec hvect mtl text unordered-containers vector
];
benchmarkHaskellDepends = [
base criterion deepseq graph-core hashable http-api-data hvect mtl
random regex-compat text unordered-containers vector
];
homepage = "http://github.com/agrafix/Spock";
description = "abstract implementation of typed and untyped web routing";
license = stdenv.lib.licenses.mit;
}) {};
f = { mkDerivation, base, stdenv }: # <--- Remove reroute here
mkDerivation {
pname = "my-package";
version = "0.1.0.0";
src = ./.;
libraryHaskellDepends = [ base reroute ];
license = stdenv.lib.licenses.bsd3;
};
drv = haskellPackages.callPackage f {};
in
if pkgs.lib.inNixShell then drv.env else drv
@thoferon Can't you just override haskellPackages
and call the dontCheck
function on the existing package, like in this example. I think that's probably simpler.
I'm installing reroute-0.4.1.0 as a dependency as part of a nix environment and installation fails with the following test error:
It looks like it's probably some list ordering issue with the test, rather than an actual bug, but I haven't investigated further.