Closed nathankota closed 4 years ago
I'm pretty sure that an upgrade to Pro would require a complete rewrite but @steveoh would know better.
yah, not a problem, we just want to be able to set their expectations correctly. A rewrite is totally fine and acceptable. We will see when they have an appetite for it. It may not be for a while
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:15 AM Scott Davis notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm pretty sure that an upgrade to Pro would require a complete rewrite but @steveoh https://github.com/steveoh would know better.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/agrc/DEQ-TankRisk/issues/14?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABQDVH4SQENRSNHXPJYMEMTQQG3ZBA5CNFSM4JEKODAKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOECFMSLI#issuecomment-545966381, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQDVH3J2GHTDF25EKJIHCDQQG3ZBANCNFSM4JEKODAA .
-- Matt Peters
Director, Utah AGRC
385.202.3297 (o) 801.673.3362 (c) https://vimeo.com/utahagrc https://gis.utah.gov/ https://vimeo.com/utahagrc https://www.facebook.com/UtahAGRC https://twitter.com/MapUtah https://github.com/agrc
I don't think this would be a complete rewrite because this tool is built with python. Had it been written with arcobjects it would be a different story.
DEQ approved the rewrite at an estimated 50 hours.
Not too difficult as long as API’s are all in place - probably 20-30
DEQ DERR staff would like to be able to use the tool in Pro in anticipation of the eventual deprecation of ArcMap.