search

agrc / broadband

Residential Broadband Web Application
https://broadband.ugrc.utah.gov
1 stars 0 forks source link

Increase filter to 10GB #85

Open stdavis opened 6 years ago

stdavis commented 6 years ago

From Bert: Something to stay on top of...we should modify their data and the map click results...I think we keep the filter the same for now

Bert Granberg Utah AGRC @BertAGRC http://gis.utah.gov

Begin forwarded message:

From: Kelleigh Cole kcole@utah.gov Date: January 11, 2018 at 11:18:59 AM MST To: Roger Timmerman RTimmerman@utopiafiber.com Cc: "Granberg, Bert" bgranberg@utah.gov Subject: Re: Change in UTOPIA Offered Speeds

Thanks for the update. That's crazy fast. The current platform taps out at 1 Gig so we'll talk about how to do this and get back to you.

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Roger Timmerman RTimmerman@utopiafiber.com wrote: Kelleigh,

Yesterday, UTOPIA Fiber launched a 10 Gbps residential offering, available anywhere in our coverage area. Businesses can get up to 100 Gbps anywhere that UTOPIA Fiber is available. Can we get our data updated to reflect this? Here is some press related to the announcement, with more likely to come…

https://www.deseretnews.com/article/900007289/utopia-to-offer-fastest-internet-service-in-the-country.html

Thanks,

stdavis commented 5 years ago

@ZachBeck Do you know if our data reflect these higher speeds?

stdavis commented 4 years ago

@ZachBeck Ping, when you have a minute...

ZachBeck commented 4 years ago

Is this for the fiber hexagons?

stdavis commented 4 years ago

No, it's for UBBMAP.UBBADMIN.BB_Service, the data that feeds the residential BB map.

ZachBeck commented 4 years ago

BB_Service shows 10gb for utopia, last edited on 10/28/2019

stdavis commented 4 years ago

Here's what the sliders look like in production currently: image

Here's the distribution of values in the data: image image

Here's what the current state of the rewrite is: image

We obviously can't have a slider stop for each unique value in the data. And I'm not sure if we want to hide some of the data by default. Perhaps the sliders should be something like this?

image

That way, no data would be hidden by default. @nathankota Thoughts? I know that Bert and Kelleigh had major opinions about this back when the first version was built, but I'm not sure if anyone cares now.

nathankota commented 4 years ago

I don't think opinions are as strong anymore, and I also do not think to bit of lost granularity at the low end is significant. Perhaps others disagree. I do think it is important to include the additional factor of 10 at the top of the range. Personally, I think the new slider idea works well.