codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Base: 91.18% // Head: 91.59% // Increases project coverage by +0.40% :tada:
Coverage data is based on head (
bf475eb) compared to base (175c43e). Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #39 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 91.18% 91.59% +0.40% ========================================== Files 6 6 Lines 692 690 -2 Branches 92 91 -1 ========================================== + Hits 631 632 +1 + Misses 54 52 -2 + Partials 7 6 -1 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/agrc/palletjack/pull/39?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=agrc) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/palletjack/loaders.py](https://codecov.io/gh/agrc/palletjack/pull/39?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=agrc#diff-c3JjL3BhbGxldGphY2svbG9hZGVycy5weQ==) | `89.00% <100.00%> (+1.37%)` | :arrow_up: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=agrc). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=agrc):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
This was a relic from when I was publishing via Pro. I don't believe that this is a good idea anymore.