Monthly Rural Data Requests (2024 Q3)

[MichaelAGRC]

Benefit

By requesting data monthly from select rural counties of Utah, we endeavor to keep our public facing data as up to date as possible.

Acceptance Criteria

Receiving data from the rural counties will be counted as accepted criteria.

Notes

UGRC's SGID Data Update Schedule (address points, parcels, roads) Data requests typically happen the first week of the month. Some counties or datasets are available for download and do not need to be requested. Some counties also send updates when needed (e.g. Kane parcels). We could document here counties available from AGOL or the like:

Data Requested from county/Received and Available From L:\agrc\data\county_obtained

January	County	Addresses Requested	Addresses Received	Parcels Requested	Parcels Received	Roads Requested	Roads Received
Duchesne	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [ ]
Grand	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]
Summit	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [ ]
Wasatch	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]

Parcels processed: Grand, Wasatch,

February	County	Addresses Requested	Addresses Received	Parcels Requested	Parcels Received	Roads Requested	Roads Received
Cache	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [x]
Carbon	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]
Juab	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [ ]
Morgan	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [ ]
Tooele	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]

Parcels processed: Tooele, Carbon

March	County	Addresses Requested	Addresses Received	Parcels Requested	Parcels Received	Roads Requested	Roads Received
Box Elder	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]
Garfield	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]
Iron	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]	- [x]
Uintah	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [ ]	- [x]	- [ ]

Parcels processed: Garfield, Iron

Risks

Not receiving the data is a risk, but not one that we can easily mitigate.

• [x] how
• [x] these
• [x] are
• [ ] intended to be
• [ ] used

Issue Reference

refs #

[MichaelAGRC]

Thanks to @rkelson for suggestions on improving the usefulness of this feature. I have taken it a step further and added the request itself into the matrix. Hopefully this will allow a bit more transparency to the process.

[rkelson]

Looking good. You can probably cross the bridge when you get there but my guess is there needs to be a spot to track the miscellaneous county data that rolls in, off schedule, from the rural counties.

[MichaelAGRC]

All rural data for January requested 1/5/2024. -Michael

[MichaelAGRC]

Sprint 4 Notes

All rural data for February requested 2/5/2024.

[ZachBeck]

@MichaelAGRC, no need to request address points from Garfield for March, Les sent me an update on 2/15.

[rkelson]

Considering the data received might come well after the data is requested, I've added a comment for the parcels i've processed so I don't keep going crazy.

[MichaelAGRC]

This is closed.