Closed mhchou closed 4 months ago
Motorola conducted a hybrid ArcGIS Pro demo on 5/22 with all the Utah agencies which also proposed the partnership with UGRC for the Pro upgrade projects. With my involvement in these projects, I will be able to integrate the processes necessary and achieve these goals.
The tentative list of agencies that will be involved with the Pro upgrade projects is shown below:
ArcGIS Pro Migration (in order) A full ArcGIS Pro Migration would be needed. The first two agencies we would go through as part of a traditional 5 week process. The remaining efforts could be streamlined to less time.
GeoValidation Upgrade & ArcGIS Pro Migration Motorola Solutions GIS Analyst would be more involved with these efforts to support the GeoValidaiton activation. The build of the ArcPro setup would be the same process as the above category. *agencies that we are still confirming their current Address Validation platform (classic, sentryx, geovalidation)
Completed or Nearing Completion
Is this related to these other planning items?
@steveoh It is not related to any of those planning times. Nathan and I have made comments under those items accordingly. Thank you!
This issue has grown into the Motorola ArcPro Migration initiative for FY25.
Benefit
The routine updates will be less tedious and smoother, which will enable UGRC to provide more frequent updates without signing contracts with specific PSAPs.
With the help of Portal, we will no longer provide updates through a Dropbox link, instead, PSAP can grab the newest dataset from SGID anytime they desire.
Acceptance Criteria
For St. George, Weber, Layton PSAPs:
Notes
There is a bottleneck in providing speedy quality customization to all the PSAPs while being the only 911 data coordinator from the State. The solution going forward is for the State/UGRC to initiate the utilization of the statewide dataset - SGID. It has the standardization that all PSAPs in the State will adopt, which also follows the federal NG911 standard from NENA. This initiative will kill 2 birds with 1 stone. UGRC is holding back from creating data ourselves (customization) locally, which includes creating fake addresses/roads and giving data stewardship back to the local authorities (city/county/state like UDOT).
Risks
No response
Issue Reference
refs #324