search

agrc / porter

UGRC tracks the additions, replacements, and deletions of SGID items (in the broadest sense of add, replace, or delete) through issues in this repository.
https://gis.utah.gov/documentation/policy/
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Agricultural Protection Zones from the department of Agriculture #149

Closed brigsz closed 1 year ago

brigsz commented 3 years ago

Summary

Introduce your data, where it comes from, why it is being added etc.

The data should be available in

1 Check [x] all the areas where you expect the data to show up.

The data is of high quality

Where is the data source

Choose one.

Action items

  1. Assign a person who should complete the task by replacing name with their github @name.
  2. Check [x] the box when the task is completed and add the date of completion.
  3. ~Strike~ out all items that do not apply.

:robot: Automation validation

  1. Assign yourself or someone to check the item by replacing name with their github @name.
  2. Check [x] the box and add the date of verification 2020/01/01 when the task is verified.
  3. ~Strike~ out all items that do not apply.

Notification

Group Task Assignments

  1. Check [x] the box when you have assigned all the tasks relevant to your group.
gregbunce commented 3 years ago

I reached out to Anne Johnson of Agriculture this morning requesting more information on this as well as asking if they have this layer in AGOL. Also, I offered our assistance.

She said she is working on getting this layer in AGOL now and it should be done in a few days. She will keep me posted.

steveoh commented 3 years ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 7 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
steveoh commented 2 years ago

@gregbunce will you follow up on this?

gregbunce commented 2 years ago

i reached out to Anne again. waiting to hear back.

gregbunce commented 2 years ago

update: haven't heard anything back yet. I sent a friendly follow-up.

steveoh commented 2 years ago

@brigsz how badly do we want to chase this?

brigsz commented 2 years ago

I would ask your friend Kris Watson, If he says let it go, then we should.

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 5:05 PM steveoh @.***> wrote:

@brigsz https://github.com/brigsz how badly do we want to chase this?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/agrc/porter/issues/149#issuecomment-1109122904, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQDVH2X5W6JGJ3VRHJO2X3VG4QMJANCNFSM5AYHNIOA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Matt Peters

Director, Utah UGRC

385.202.3297 (o) 801.673.3362 (c)

steveoh commented 2 years ago

I reached out to Kris today. I'll update this with his response.

nathankota commented 1 year ago

dinged Anne again today

gregbunce commented 1 year ago

thanks, nathan! my apologies... i dropped the ball on this one. Anne sent me the data earlier this year and it's been hiding in my email. that's one is on me.

I uploaded the data she sent me to our google drive. i'll work out the next steps.

shout out (anyone) if you're interested in assisting on this one - otherwise, i'll push it forward.

steveoh commented 1 year ago

I'm removing the block on this one since @gregbunce seems to be able to move it forward.

gregbunce commented 1 year ago

i added this item to the next data team meeting agenda to see if i can get some assistance on this one.

agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 7 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 7 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 7 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 7 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 7 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 7 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
eneemann commented 1 year ago

With Sweeper automatically running on data changes in the internal SDE based on change detection, should we just remove the redundant Sweeper check?

gregbunce commented 1 year ago

maybe the check needs to be, "check sweeper results and verify that this layer passed minimum checks"

steveoh commented 1 year ago

With Sweeper automatically running on data changes in the internal SDE based on change detection, should we just remove the redundant Sweeper check?

Sweeper should run on the data before it's loaded into the SGID.

gregbunce commented 1 year ago

@eneemann, if you have it set up to run locally, can you assist with this? the data is here.

eneemann commented 1 year ago

Hmmm...I do not have it set up locally anymore since I got my new laptop.

eneemann commented 1 year ago

@gregbunce I'll fix it this time:

INFO    03-30 14:43:09 duplicates:   33 Working on Duplicates for: AgProtectionAreas
INFO    03-30 14:43:09   metadata:  106 Sweep Workspace is:   C:\Users\eneemann\Downloads\AgProtectionAreas\AgProtectionAreas.gdb
Duplicate Test Report for AgProtectionAreas
3 issues found:
    2384
    3005
    3612
---
Empty Test Report for AgProtectionAreas
No issues found!
---
Metadata Test Report for AgProtectionAreas
3 issues found:
    Summary is longer than Description!
    Description is missing link to gis.utah.gov data page.
    Use limitations text is not standard.
---
eneemann commented 1 year ago

The swept version was uploaded to that folder. Still a few metadata recommendations and tags need to be added.

INFO    03-30 14:47:51   __main__:  124 running 3 sweepers. try fix: False
INFO    03-30 14:47:51 duplicates:   33 Working on Duplicates for: AgProtectionAreas
INFO    03-30 14:47:51   metadata:  106 Sweep Workspace is:   C:\Users\eneemann\Downloads\AgProtectionAreas\AgProtectionAreas.gdb
Duplicate Test Report for AgProtectionAreas
No issues found!
---
Empty Test Report for AgProtectionAreas
No issues found!
---
Metadata Test Report for AgProtectionAreas
2 issues found:
    Summary is longer than Description!
    Description is missing link to gis.utah.gov data page.
---
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 9 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 9 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 9 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 9 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 9 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
rkelson has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
stdavis commented 1 year ago

Are we waiting on @gregbunce to load this data into internal? Just want to make sure that this issue isn't waiting on me.

gregbunce commented 1 year ago

yeah, "It's me, not you". ha. It's on my radar, just need to block out the time. thanks, Scott

gregbunce commented 1 year ago

[update] - the swept data has been loaded into Internal. I'll work on the sharing permissions and the agol items table asap so it can begin to bubble up to all the right places.

steveoh commented 1 year ago

Do we need to ask the steward for updated data since it's been so long 🤣

gregbunce commented 1 year ago

I did reach out to her with that question and also for more information on some of the fields and field values.

gregbunce commented 1 year ago

@stdavis i believe it's ready for you to wire up the farm to agol process. let me know if i missed anything.

also, do you mind adding the agol item id in the META.AGOLItems table when we know what it is?

jacobdadams commented 1 year ago

Auditor has verified the tags, name, and sharing in AGOL 👍

agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
@gregbunce has completed 3 out of 9 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
rkelson has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
steveoh commented 1 year ago

I can't tell who added the stewardship record but omit the SGID in the layer name next time so it doesn't foul up the sgid index.

gregbunce commented 1 year ago

It was me. Thanks for the info.

stdavis commented 1 year ago

@stdavis i believe it's ready for you to wire up the farm to agol process. let me know if i missed anything.

Nothing needs to be done aside from adding the row to the meta table.

also, do you mind adding the agol item id in the META.AGOLItems table when we know what it is?

This is done automatically by forklift. Everything looks good from my perspective.

agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 149

check status
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
gregbunce has completed 9 out of 9 tasks :+1:
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
stdavis has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
rkelson has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for FARMING.AgriculturalProtectionAreas

check status
internal sgid :+1:
meta table
- item id :+1:
- item name :+1:
- geometry type :+1:
open sgid :+1:
open data :+1:
arcgis online :+1:
stewardship
- Description :+1:
- Data Source :+1:
- Website URL :+1:
- Endpoint :+1:
- Data Type :+1:
steveoh commented 1 year ago

all thumbs.

This went in as agricultural protection areas instead of zones fyi