Closed gregbunce closed 2 years ago
@gregbunce I wonder if the table rename tasks for this and the other political districts issues should be moved to their own porter issue. There is potentially a significant amount of impact with renaming tables in SGID and I worry that it could get lost if they are combined with the introduction of new data. They could probably all be grouped into a single issue since they are all very similar.
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 3 out of 3 tasks | :+1: |
@mheagin has completed 1 out of 3 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 1 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
good thinking, @stdavis
the task of renaming these layers has moved to a separate, new porter issue (167).
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 3 out of 3 tasks | :+1: |
@mheagin has completed 1 out of 3 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 1 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :no_entry: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
stewardship | :no_entry: Did not find POLITICAL.UtahSenateDistricts2022to2032 in the worksheet |
We need to update the download link for the Geodatabase and Shapefiles, they are still going to the 2012 data
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Data Type | :no_entry: |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Data Type | :no_entry: |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Data Type | :no_entry: |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Data Type | :no_entry: |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Data Type | :no_entry: |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
Color4 field has been populated incorrectly. Polygons sharing a common boundary shouldn't have the same color 4 numeric value, in other words neighboring polygons should always have a different color than their neighbor.
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Data Type | :no_entry: |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
@ZachBeck et all, has anyone fixed the color 4 field and the missing item on the stewardship tab?
I can't speak to the stewardship tab but I noticed the color 4 field problem for the first time this morning. It looks like this is possibly a problem in all the new political boundary data.
This is no longer possible too many situations where up to six districts come together. Set as best as possible right now.
@mheagin you signed off on the spreadsheet part but it's missing some data that will need to be corrected. The details are in the automatic response.
So do we replace the field with more colors then? Are 4 colors still useful or problematic if there are collisions?
The values in the color 4 field need to be updated so there aren't collisions. I have a map request from Senator Anderegg that needs to be printed by tomorrow afternoon that relies on this field.
Yes the four color field does not work for the House or the Senate. Those need to be fix. My machine is not working today so you all are on your own.
@mheagin, I updated the Color4 field values so that they're working properly now. Lets chat about the other political feature classes next week if you have time.
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Data Type | :no_entry: |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks | :no_entry: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Data Type | :no_entry: |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
i propose we close this out. any objections?
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
gbunce has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Data Type | :no_entry: |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
gbunce has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Data Type | :no_entry: |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
I made this update this morning on the steward ship spreadsheet:
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
gbunce has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | Exception was thrown! |
meta table | Exception was thrown! |
stewardship | |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
- Data Type | :+1: |
check | status |
---|---|
gregbunce has completed 5 out of 5 tasks | :+1: |
mheagin has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
stdavis has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
gbunce has completed 2 out of 2 tasks | :+1: |
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
nathankota has completed 1 out of 1 tasks | :+1: |
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :+1: |
meta table | |
- item id | :+1: |
- item name | :+1: |
- geometry type | :+1: |
open sgid | :+1: |
open data | :+1: |
arcgis online | :+1: |
stewardship | |
- Description | :+1: |
- Data Source | :+1: |
- Website URL | :+1: |
- Endpoint | :+1: |
- Data Type | :+1: |
Go team!
Summary
Background
Recently, the Utah Legislative body voted to approve/pass the Utah State Senate districts created by the Utah Legislative Redistricting Committee.
The data should be available in
1 Check [x] all the areas where you expect the data to show up.
The data is of high quality
2021/12/03
)Where is the data source
Choose one.
Action items
name
with their github@name
.2021/11/19
) ~- [ ] Configure forklift for Farm from AGOL (@stdavis, completed:2021/00/00
)~2021/12/01
)2021/12/01
)SGID.META.AGOLItems
record (@stdavis, completed:2021/11/19
):robot: Automation validation
name
with their github@name
.2020/01/01
when the task is verified.2022/01/26
)2021/11/29
)2021/11/23
)2021/11/30
)2021/12/02
)2022/01/26
)Notification
Group Task Assignments