search

agrc / porter

UGRC tracks the additions, replacements, and deletions of SGID items (in the broadest sense of add, replace, or delete) through issues in this repository.
https://gis.utah.gov/documentation/policy/
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Remove SGID.WATER.Floodplains from SGID #229

Closed rkelson closed 1 year ago

rkelson commented 1 year ago

Summary

The UDEM Risk MAP Program Manager has requested we remove the layer from the SGID as updates are pushed out by FEMA irregularly and they would like us to point people straight to the authoritative steward's resources.

Migration Guide

A short summary of how users affected by this deprecation can modify their workflows and projects to continue to get similar or improved functionality

There are services and downloads available from the federal steward FEMA that will always be the most current. https://hazards.fema.gov/gis/nfhl/rest/services/public/NFHL/MapServer https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/NFHL/searchResulthttps:/hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/NFHL/searchRes11ult

Action items

  1. Assign a person who should complete the task by replacing name with their github @name.
  2. Check [x] the box when the task is completed and add the date of completion.
  3. ~Strike~ out all items that do not apply.

Soft Delete

The purpose of the soft delete is to ensure that all of our users and applications have gracefully migrated off of the dataset. Soft deletes will remain in effect for 14 days. During this time, we will have the ability to restore the dataset to its original SGID offering(s). After these 14 days, the item is then ready for a hard delete.

Note: If this dataset is being replaced, then wait until the new data is publicly available before completing these steps:

Hard Delete

Hard deletes are final. It is recommended to complete the soft delete process before moving on to these steps. If you decide to skip the soft delete, note that you will need to incorporate some of those steps here.

:robot: Automation validation

  1. Assign yourself or someone to check the item by replacing name with their github @name.
  2. Check [x] the box and add the date of verification 2020/01/01 when the task is verified.
  3. ~Strike~ out all items that do not apply.

Are there service dependencies

Notification

Group Task Assignments

  1. Check [x] the box when you have assigned all the tasks relevant to your group.
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 229

check status
@rkelson has completed 3 out of 12 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 229

check status
@rkelson has completed 7 out of 10 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
steveoh commented 1 year ago

The sgid index appears to have the wrong endpoint url. It looks to still be going to our open data. I would expect it to go to fema's arcgis server

image
rkelson commented 1 year ago

I made the change but it looks like the sgid-index tasks were assigned to you.

steveoh commented 1 year ago

This would originate from the stewardship task which has your name and is struck out. The sgid index task is a validation and is what I did above.

agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 229

check status
@rkelson has completed 7 out of 10 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 3 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 229

check status
@rkelson has completed 7 out of 10 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
steveoh has completed 4 out of 4 tasks :+1:
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for WATER.Floodplains

check status
internal sgid :no_entry:
meta table :+1:
stewardship
- deprecation issue link :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 229

check status
rkelson has completed 9 out of 9 tasks :+1:
@jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 4 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 3 tasks :no_entry:
steveoh has completed 4 out of 4 tasks :+1:
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for WATER.Floodplains

check status
internal sgid :+1:
meta table :+1:
stewardship
- deprecation issue link :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for tasks - 229

check status
rkelson has completed 9 out of 9 tasks :+1:
jacobdadams has completed 3 out of 3 tasks :+1:
stdavis has completed 3 out of 3 tasks :+1:
steveoh has completed 4 out of 4 tasks :+1:
eneemann has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 1 year ago

conductor results for WATER.Floodplains

check status
internal sgid :+1:
meta table :+1:
stewardship
- deprecation issue link :no_entry: