Open jacobdadams opened 5 months ago
Discover or AGOL are the places we have available to serve this sort of data. I assume it would be tiled?
Sorry, I should have explained more. The skyshade is a pure raster product, like a hillshade but with a significantly longer processing time (it took about a week to run on my old office desktop). The output raster needs to be styled to a user's preference, so pre-rendering wouldn't work.
The original output was something like 24gb, but I was able to get it down to about 4gb in the process of dividing it into the same sized chunks we currently serve the underlying 10m DEM in. At this size, a single download wouldn't be too much of a burden on users, so maybe adding it as a file-only AGOL item and linking to it from a datapage would be the better course of action.
Yeah or GCS is a cheap option for downloads. So, what would be shown in raster.utah.gov?
If we went the raster.utah.gov route, it'd look the same as when you go to download the USGS DEMs- a bunch of tiles that would link to zip files in GCS.
I'm intrigued by the idea of hosting it as an item in AGOL. I'd have to check the storage costs, but then we could expose it through Open Data as well.
Does that mean that raster would only have a tile index? I use the preview feature but that wouldn't be available would it?
huh, I guess I've never used the preview feature and forgot it was there. Yeah, without a served version of it somewhere, it would be like the Lidar DEMs- just an extent/tile index.
Rick can correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it'd take too much space/cost to make a layer on Discover, but I don't know that it's worth it just for the extent. It wouldn't be terribly useful as its own layer... maybe... I mean, I guess I could do a "default" style that I like and then we could have that as a pre-canned product in discover with the raw data available for download if desired.
I guess I could do a "default" style that I like and then we could have that as a pre-canned product in discover with the raw data available for download if desired.
I like this idea
check | status |
---|---|
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@brigsz has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 0 out of 3 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :no_entry: |
meta table | |
- item id | :no_entry: |
- item name | :no_entry: |
- geometry type | :no_entry: |
stewardship | :no_entry: Did not find category.internaltablename in the worksheet |
Rick and I chatted about this today and came up with the following plan to move forward:
raster.utah.gov
under a new category in the "Step 1" box (or however it looks when we rebuild the app).I can start step one right away, and I'll need to work with @stdavis on step two. Step three can wait until later™.
discover service usage courtesy of Rick:
So the hillshade would become the preview service for this new layer in raster.utah.gov?
correct, if/when we get there.
check | status |
---|---|
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@brigsz has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 3 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :no_entry: |
meta table | |
- item id | :no_entry: |
- item name | :no_entry: |
- geometry type | :no_entry: |
stewardship | :no_entry: Did not find category.internaltablename in the worksheet |
check | status |
---|---|
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@brigsz has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 3 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :no_entry: |
meta table | |
- item id | :no_entry: |
- item name | :no_entry: |
- geometry type | :no_entry: |
stewardship | :no_entry: Did not find category.internaltablename in the worksheet |
check | status |
---|---|
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@brigsz has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 3 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
check | status |
---|---|
internal sgid | :no_entry: |
meta table | |
- item id | :no_entry: |
- item name | :no_entry: |
- geometry type | :no_entry: |
stewardship | :no_entry: Did not find category.internaltablename in the worksheet |
check | status |
---|---|
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@brigsz has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 3 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
Is this a stretch goal or needing a waiting or blocked label?
Added waiting label to pause Conductor notifications since this is in the FY25 Q1 I&P Sprint 6
check | status |
---|---|
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 2 tasks | :no_entry: |
@brigsz has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
@steveoh has completed 1 out of 3 tasks | :no_entry: |
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks | :no_entry: |
Summary
Several audience members at the 2024 UGIC Iron Cartographer sessions wanted access to our skyshade. This is the same dataset used in Zach's basemaps but converted to 8-bit int and chunked into the same chunks as the source USGS DEMs.
I figured a porter issue is the best way to start the discussion of getting it onto
raster.utah.gov
.The data should be available in
1 Check [x] all the areas where you expect the data to show up.
The data is of high quality
2024/00/00
)~2024/00/00
)~2024/00/00
)~Where is the data source
Choose one.
Action items
name
with their github@name
.2024/00/00
)~2024/00/00
)~2024/00/00
)raster.utah.gov
sources (@rkelson, completed2024/00/00
)raster.utah.gov
(?) (@stdavis, completed2024/00/00
)2024/00/00
)2024/00/00
)SGID.META.AGOLItems
record (name, completed:2024/00/00
)~AGOL_ITEM_ID
will be populated by Forklift after it publishes the new AGOL item.static
orshelved
item (name, completed:2024/00/00
)~2024/00/00
):robot: Automation validation
name
with their github@name
.2020/01/01
when the task is verified.2024/00/00
)~2024/00/00
)~2024/00/00
)~2024/00/00
)~2024/00/00
)2024/00/00
)Notification
Group Task Assignments