search

agrc / porter

UGRC tracks the additions, replacements, and deletions of SGID items (in the broadest sense of add, replace, or delete) through issues in this repository.
https://gis.utah.gov/documentation/policy/
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Create labels for extra context #33

Closed steveoh closed 4 years ago

steveoh commented 4 years ago

Describe the problem you are having

I think labels could help give context to the state of an open issue.

For additions something like...

We could do something similar with removals.

I wonder if you think this would be too much ceremony or if it would be helpful.

nathankota commented 4 years ago

I think it would be useful for deciphering the status of an issue at a glance, similar to open sgid issues.

steveoh commented 4 years ago

I think it would be useful for deciphering the status of an issue at a glance, similar to open sgid issues.

Can you think of some useful labels?

stdavis commented 4 years ago

I would worry about creating more process and required clicks. This almost seems like a good use-case for projects. However, that's a whole other can of worms. I would say that the labels might be nice for the GitHub-geeks to keep things organized, but I wouldn't make it any required part of the process.

ZachBeck commented 4 years ago

I agree with Scott, there's a lot of T's to dot and I's to cross already. I'd vote to run a few feature classes through the process and if it seems like things are falling through the cracks then reevaluate the process.

nathankota commented 4 years ago

I think it would be useful for deciphering the status of an issue at a glance, similar to open sgid issues.

Can you think of some useful labels?

I accept being outvoted at this point. If we revisit labels I will help to suggest some.