agrc / porter

UGRC tracks the additions, replacements, and deletions of SGID items (in the broadest sense of add, replace, or delete) through issues in this repository.
https://gis.utah.gov/documentation/policy/
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Add CADASTRE.Parcels_Uintah_LIR to Internal SGID #337

Closed rkelson closed 4 days ago

rkelson commented 1 month ago

Summary

After all these years Uintah has finally provided LIR information making it the last of the 29 counties to add to the Internal DB.

The data should be available in

1 Check [x] all the areas where you expect the data to show up.

The data is of high quality

~- [ ] Sweeper checks have run and passed (@rkelson on 2024/00/00)~ automated sweeper tasks will run and not remove duplicates

Where is the data source

Choose one.

Action items

  1. Assign a person who should complete the task by replacing name with their github @name.
  2. Check [x] the box when the task is completed and add the date of completion.
  3. ~Strike~ out all items that do not apply.

:robot: Automation validation

  1. Assign yourself or someone to check the item by replacing name with their github @name.
  2. Check [x] the box and add the date of verification 2020/01/01 when the task is verified.
  3. ~Strike~ out all items that do not apply.

Notification

Group Task Assignments

  1. Check [x] the box when you have assigned all the tasks relevant to your group.
agrc-conductor commented 1 month ago

conductor results for tasks - 337

check status
rkelson has completed 7 out of 7 tasks :+1:
@brigsz has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 2 out of 5 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@jacobdadams has completed 0 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
agrc-conductor commented 1 month ago

conductor results for CADASTRE.Parcels_Uintah_LIR

check status
internal sgid :+1:
meta table
- item id :no_entry:
- item name :+1:
- geometry type :+1:
open sgid :+1:
open data :+1:
stewardship
- justification :no_entry:
- dataContactEmail :no_entry:
- dataContactName :no_entry:
- displayName :+1:
- description :+1:
- category :+1:
- productType :+1:
- ugrcSteward :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 3 weeks ago

conductor results for tasks - 337

check status
rkelson has completed 7 out of 7 tasks :+1:
@brigsz has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 2 out of 5 tasks :no_entry:
@stdavis has completed 0 out of 1 tasks :no_entry:
jacobdadams has completed 2 out of 2 tasks :+1:
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 3 weeks ago

conductor results for CADASTRE.Parcels_Uintah_LIR

check status
internal sgid :+1:
meta table
- item id :+1:
- item name :+1:
- geometry type :+1:
open sgid :+1:
open data :+1:
arcgis online :+1:
stewardship
- justification :no_entry:
- dataContactEmail :no_entry:
- dataContactName :no_entry:
- displayName :+1:
- description :+1:
- category :+1:
- productType :+1:
- ugrcSteward :+1:
steveoh commented 3 weeks ago

@rkelson The gis.utah.gov issue is marked as completed but is failing my validation. You'll need to add an entry for the Uintah LIR parcels.

https://github.com/agrc/gis.utah.gov/blob/main/src/data/downloadMetadata.ts#L399-L405

agrc-conductor commented 2 weeks ago

conductor results for tasks - 337

check status
rkelson has completed 7 out of 7 tasks :+1:
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 4 out of 6 tasks :no_entry:
jacobdadams has completed 2 out of 2 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 2 weeks ago

conductor results for CADASTRE.Parcels_Uintah_LIR

check status
internal sgid :+1:
meta table
- item id :+1:
- item name :+1:
- geometry type :+1:
open sgid :+1:
open data :+1:
arcgis online :+1:
stewardship
- justification :no_entry:
- dataContactEmail :no_entry:
- dataContactName :no_entry:
- displayName :+1:
- description :+1:
- category :+1:
- productType :+1:
- ugrcSteward :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 1 week ago

conductor results for tasks - 337

check status
rkelson has completed 7 out of 7 tasks :+1:
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
@steveoh has completed 4 out of 6 tasks :no_entry:
jacobdadams has completed 2 out of 2 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 1 week ago

conductor results for CADASTRE.Parcels_Uintah_LIR

check status
internal sgid :+1:
meta table
- item id :+1:
- item name :+1:
- geometry type :+1:
open sgid :+1:
open data :+1:
arcgis online :+1:
stewardship
- justification :no_entry:
- dataContactEmail :no_entry:
- dataContactName :no_entry:
- displayName :+1:
- description :+1:
- category :+1:
- productType :+1:
- ugrcSteward :+1:
steveoh commented 1 week ago

This looks really close to closing out. @rkelson adding a few missing sgid index properties and @gregbunce working some magic with archives.

agrc-conductor commented 5 days ago

conductor results for tasks - 337

check status
rkelson has completed 7 out of 7 tasks :+1:
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
steveoh has completed 6 out of 6 tasks :+1:
jacobdadams has completed 2 out of 2 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 5 days ago

conductor results for CADASTRE.Parcels_Uintah_LIR

check status
internal sgid :+1:
meta table
- item id :+1:
- item name :+1:
- geometry type :+1:
open sgid :+1:
open data :+1:
arcgis online :+1:
stewardship
- justification :no_entry:
- dataContactEmail :no_entry:
- dataContactName :no_entry:
- displayName :+1:
- description :+1:
- category :+1:
- productType :+1:
- ugrcSteward :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 5 days ago

conductor results for tasks - 337

check status
rkelson has completed 7 out of 7 tasks :+1:
@gregbunce has completed 1 out of 2 tasks :no_entry:
steveoh has completed 6 out of 6 tasks :+1:
jacobdadams has completed 2 out of 2 tasks :+1:
agrc-conductor commented 5 days ago

conductor results for CADASTRE.Parcels_Uintah_LIR

check status
internal sgid :+1:
meta table
- item id :+1:
- item name :+1:
- geometry type :+1:
open sgid :+1:
open data :+1:
arcgis online :+1:
stewardship
- justification :no_entry:
- dataContactEmail :no_entry:
- dataContactName :no_entry:
- displayName :+1:
- description :+1:
- category :+1:
- productType :+1:
- ugrcSteward :+1:
gregbunce commented 5 days ago

regarding the archive record series: i've reached out to Elizabeth Perkes to get this started.

i'm also exploring if we archive LIR parcels. any insight would be helpful. i'm not seeing LIR parcels in the record series resources i have.

rkelson commented 5 days ago

here is an 'archive' of the lir parcels but it is not necessarily sent to St. Archives.

I have a reoccurring July 6th calendar reminder to create archive copies of the following layers that Matt would send to St. Archives. Not sure if there is another list of layers we archive image

rkelson commented 5 days ago

those SGID Index fields are going to remain empty. I do not intend to use the St. Auditors contact or email for the LIR parcels. I'm not even sure what Justification should be populated with and in the SGID Index they look like simple internal notes for the few layers that have Justification populated.

gregbunce commented 5 days ago

@rkelson would you agree that this is the LIR stuff?

rkelson commented 5 days ago

@gregbunce looks like it to me but I knew nothing about it

gregbunce commented 4 days ago

@rkelson where can I get a copy of the data to be archived? should i pull it down from Internal or do you a process with your script? thanks!

rkelson commented 4 days ago

The script I use is for the short list of layers that for some reason Matt wanted pulled from agol and not internal. I think what was happening with those layers is different than this Record Series. You could just pull it from internal and send it to them and go from there but I know the layers I created for Matt had to be named a certain way and in a specific folder structure. Below is a sample: image

gregbunce commented 4 days ago

This data has been sent to state archives and assigned to the LIR record series (30660).

rick is adding contact and justification info to the sgid index, and therefore this issue is complete.

thanks everyone.