Closed inkenbrandt closed 9 years ago
I like the tabbed table idea.
Not going to be able to fit all of these fields in the two tables. I would suggest not having more than 5 or 6 fields per table if we can help it. Here's an example of the space issues: http://share.flairbuilder.com/?sid=I64FYv95R7
These are the following I would like to see in the tabular section of the UI. Ideally, we could view both the stations and the results tables via tabs - like what is done in the typical ArcMap interface.
For the Results
table:
Parameter
(Param
)Result Measure Value
(ResultValue
)Result Measure Unit
(Unit
)Sample Date
(SampleDate
)Station Id
(StationId
)Result Detection Condition
(DetectCond
)For the Stations
table:
Database Source
(DataSource
)Monitoring Location Id
(StationId
)Monitoring Location Name
(StationName
)Monitoring Location Type
(StationType
)Well Depth
(Depth
)WR Well Id
(WIN
)That should work.
These are the following I would like to see in the tabular section of the UI. Ideally, we could view both the stations and the results tables via tabs - like what is done in the typical ArcMap interface.
For the
Results
table (aliases are listed):Database Source
Organization Name
Parameter
Parameter Group
Result Measure Value
Sample Date
Sample Media
Station Id
Result Measure Unit
Result Detection Condition
For the
Stations
table (aliases are listed):Database Source
Monitoring Location Id
Monitoring Location Name
Monitoring Location Type
Organization Name
Latitude
Longitude
DEM Elevation m
Aquifer
Formation Type
Well Depth
WR Well Id