Hello, excuse me. I trained the model directly before without modifying the parameters. There is a big gap between the running results and the results in your paper. Then I revised the corresponding parameters according to the implementation details in your paper. Because of the poor performance of my computer, I revised the batch_size to 32. As in other papers, the loss value does not converge during the training process, and when testing. The difference between the findings and those in your paper is particularly large. I'd like to ask where I didn't get it right.@agrimgupta92
Hello, excuse me. I trained the model directly before without modifying the parameters. There is a big gap between the running results and the results in your paper. Then I revised the corresponding parameters according to the implementation details in your paper. Because of the poor performance of my computer, I revised the batch_size to 32. As in other papers, the loss value does not converge during the training process, and when testing. The difference between the findings and those in your paper is particularly large. I'd like to ask where I didn't get it right.@agrimgupta92