Hello!
First of all. thanks for your great work.
But I have a little doubt about whether the pooling really helps avoid collision. I count the number of collision times of SGAN(which doesn't use the pooling) and SGAN-P, specially, the models are downloaded from yours. The threshold distance to judge whether the collision between two person is happened is about 0.08m , which is the minimum distance between two persons in all five datasets. And as show in the following table, SGAN-P doesn't show better collision avoidence performance than SGAN and it seems V-LSTM achieves the best performance. So, really does the pooling help avoid collision? or maybe it is just our garbage imagination.
Hello! First of all. thanks for your great work. But I have a little doubt about whether the pooling really helps avoid collision. I count the number of collision times of SGAN(which doesn't use the pooling) and SGAN-P, specially, the models are downloaded from yours. The threshold distance to judge whether the collision between two person is happened is about 0.08m , which is the minimum distance between two persons in all five datasets. And as show in the following table, SGAN-P doesn't show better collision avoidence performance than SGAN and it seems V-LSTM achieves the best performance. So, really does the pooling help avoid collision? or maybe it is just our garbage imagination.