Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Original comment by chm.duquesne
on 25 Sep 2010 at 1:25
i completely agree with this request.
Not only does the notification trigger the notification sound...but the
notifications also stack on each other leaving me with many "new messages" to
check after having already responded them via TMP
This also leads into another possibility of a "mark as read" option for any
texts sent through TMP
Original comment by jescoaz....@gmail.com
on 6 Oct 2010 at 9:49
I also have noticed that if you use a seperate gmail account for this app
(since you cannot chat with yourself in gmail)and you have GTalk signed in on
your device then you also get chat notifications on your device every time you
send or recieve a command.
Original comment by powe6...@gmail.com
on 6 Oct 2010 at 10:00
[deleted comment]
this would be nice here is a quick way to implement this
public void setRead(Context context,String SmsNumber, String smsContent) {
try {
ContentResolver cr = context.getContentResolver();
Uri rowUri = Uri.parse("content://sms");
Cursor c = context.getContentResolver().query(smsUri, null,null,null,null);
ContentValues values = new ContentValues();
values.put(c.getColumnName(6),"1");
cr.update(rowUri, values, " address='"+recnumber+"'and body='"+smsContent+"'",
null) ;
} catch (Exception e) {
Log.i("exception in setRead:", e.getMessage());
}
}
Original comment by atlrudeb...@gmail.com
on 7 Oct 2010 at 10:37
I wholeheartedly agree that a "mark as read" option would be awesome. It needs
to be optional, though, because there are plenty of times when I have TMP
enabled but I'm away from my desk. It would be ideal if there was a way to
acknowledge each message from the Jabber session with a simple command (e.g.,
ack, ack-all) AND have it so replied-to messages (via the 'reply' command) can
be marked as read.
Original comment by GRTr...@gmail.com
on 8 Oct 2010 at 6:27
bump for my implementation just wanted to be sure u saw it
Original comment by atlrudeb...@gmail.com
on 15 Oct 2010 at 5:07
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
powe6...@gmail.com
on 24 Sep 2010 at 3:50