Open jonquet opened 6 years ago
Note the problem can come from only one of the 2 ontologies being mapped.
For instance: http://agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/AFO?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yso.fi%2Fonto%2Fyso%2Fp10176 is in mappings.ttl but the same label appears only in other AgroPortal ontologies in SKOS !! So mappings are not found.
Is this still relevant @jonquet ?
Need to investigate if problem is still there. If a max number of mappings is generated then yes. Will look into this
This is a tracker to follow a bug related to the automatic generation of LOOM mappings when parsing SKOS vocabularies. It has been observed for ANAEETHEs, GACS, AGROVOC, all the big SKOS resources.
Some concepts are LOOM-mapped other are not. For instance: http://agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/AGROVOC/?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Faims.fao.org%2Faos%2Fagrovoc%2Fc_4802&jump_to_nav=true has LOOM mappings where as http://agroportal.lirmm.fr/ontologies/AGROVOC?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Faims.fao.org%2Faos%2Fagrovoc%2Fc_1665#mappings does not have any.
I have checked the mappings.ttl file generated and the missing mappings are missing there also.
When looking at the parsing logs of all these ontologies, there is always only one page of 4999, or 4998 mappings being "asserted". It seems it does not extract the rest of the LOOM mappings.
Fo insatnce for AFO: