** There are 23 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest
one being 18 characters in excess of 72.
** The abstract seems to contain references
([I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices]), which it shouldn't. Please
replace those with straight textual mentions of the documents in question.
Miscellaneous warnings:
== The document doesn't use any RFC 2119 keywords, yet seems to have RFC
2119 boilerplate text.
Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
(See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references
to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)
** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 8453
Summary: 3 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 0 comments (--).
Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about
the items above.
Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info):
Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt:
Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist :
** There are 23 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest one being 18 characters in excess of 72.
** The abstract seems to contain references ([I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices]), which it shouldn't. Please replace those with straight textual mentions of the documents in question.
Miscellaneous warnings:
== The document doesn't use any RFC 2119 keywords, yet seems to have RFC 2119 boilerplate text.
Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 8453