Open seamie6 opened 6 months ago
After training my own LiDAR model, I get an IOU score of 63.8. This is quite a bit higher than the IOU presented in the paper, 60.8. Perhaps it is a typo in the paper?? I used the same parameters as the camera+radar model:
--exp_name="rgb_mine" \ --dset='trainval' \ --data_dir=XYZ \ --device_ids=[0,1,2,3] \ --ncams=6 \ --batch_size=8 \ --grad_acc=5 \ --res_scale=2 \ --do_rgbcompress=True \ --max_iters=25000 \ --log_freq=100 \ --val_freq=100 \ --save_freq=5000 \ --nworkers=12 \ --nsweeps=5 \ --use_radar=False \ --use_metaradar=False \ --use_radar_filters=False \ --use_lidar=True \
I am currently training the camera+radar model to see what happens there, again using the same parameters.
C+R gives a result similar to the paper, 55.5
After training my own LiDAR model, I get an IOU score of 63.8. This is quite a bit higher than the IOU presented in the paper, 60.8. Perhaps it is a typo in the paper?? I used the same parameters as the camera+radar model:
I am currently training the camera+radar model to see what happens there, again using the same parameters.