Closed atrauzzi closed 3 years ago
Sorry but this repo is not the forum to discuss this and I can't answer these either.
Feel free to report this to our public issue tracker.
Hm, dang. I was hoping there would be some conventional wisdom around this, nothing too detailed. But just enough to help people out.
I've opened a thread over at the official issue tracker, hopefully somebody there is willing to speak on it.
In the section about keeping cloud run services warm, the following is suggested:
I'm okay with this idea, but what I'm interested in hearing are some general thoughts around a few topics when using Cloud Scheduler to keep a Google Cloud Run service hot:
I think you get the overall idea here, some forward thinking commentary on likely gotchas might help people who are evaluating Cloud Run for latency-sensitive services.
Even if keeping a Cloud Run service warm means paying more than a service that's allowed to go dormant, if that amount is still comparable to any other always-on PaaS right now, Cloud Run's other features and abstractions are attractive enough to justify configuring a measly Cloud Scheduler.
But only if that's the only compromise! :wink: