ahonn / logseq-plugin-todo

A simple to-do list plugin for logseq
MIT License
157 stars 11 forks source link

plugin closes repeating scheduled tasks instead of re-scheduling them #13

Open konsumschaf opened 2 years ago

konsumschaf commented 2 years ago

Hi,

I am trying to enhance logseq and this plugin seems to be very helpful, but it does not work for repeating scheduled tasks, at least not like I would expect it to work. Here is what to do to reproduce:

Create:

LATER test
SCHEDULED: <2022-06-05 Sun ++1w>

If closed by the plugin, the result is:

DONE test
SCHEDULED: <2022-06-05 Sun ++1w>

if closed on the page, the result is:

LATER test
SCHEDULED: <2022-06-12 Sun ++1w>

I would expect, that the plugin generates the same result.

Thanks for your support! :pray:

konsumschaf commented 2 years ago

Logseq-Version 0.7.1 (Linux) Plugin Version 1.3.1

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

msjsc001 commented 1 year ago

Ran into the same problem with my version of v1.14.0 (win11 22h2,logseq 0.8.16)

novakwh commented 1 year ago

I have the same issue, had to stop using this otherwise elegant plugin because of it. (Mac, 0.9.8) If it won't work with repeating tasks then unfortunately I can't use it.

ahonn commented 1 year ago

This is a known issue that I have to parse and modify the content of the block according to the schedule rules in order to achieve it. Currently, I don't have enough time to solve this problem, but it's already on my agenda. You are welcome to come back and continue using it after I fix this issue.

ahonn commented 1 year ago

There weren't enough people giving feedback on this issue before, so I haven't started working on it yet. As a personal open-source project, if it meets my own needs and there aren't enough people expressing their demand for it, then it's low priority for me. Maybe now I can raise its priority appropriately.

novakwh commented 1 year ago

I totally understand! It's a beautiful plugin otherwise. Thanks for considering it.