Open vivalareda opened 1 year ago
From now on, please also put @ThomasCardin as reviewer on any DevSecOps PR
From now on, please also put @ThomasCardin as reviewer on any DevSecOps PR
I use to do that but the thing was a lot of PRs were getting approved even when he didn't review them yet since he's working only 2 days I'll add him from now on just wanted to give my opinion
and true on ADR I should always add him my mistake
I use to do that but the thing was a lot of PRs were getting approved even when he didn't review them yet since he's working only 2 days I'll add him from now on just wanted to give my opinion
the rule, if the person is absent (vacation, not working, etc), you consider their approval optional; at least they'll be able to comment when they are back with the PR. Also a reason why we shoudn't delete branches as soon as a PR is merged.
I use to do that but the thing was a lot of PRs were getting approved even when he didn't review them yet since he's working only 2 days I'll add him from now on just wanted to give my opinion
the rule, if the person is absent (vacation, not working, etc), you consider their approval optional; at least they'll be able to comment when they are back with the PR. Also a reason why we shoudn't delete branches as soon as a PR is merged.
I was not aware about that rule will do
@ThomasCardin this is an important ADR that we need to expand on to explain how we will maintain and deploy our development environments. I've added it back to the DevSecOps backlog.
@ThomasCardin can you follow up on this one? I do want us to clarify what our different environments (branch, staging, prod) are in order to explain the differences to incoming developers.
79
also closes #56 I didn't realise I already had a issue open about this my mistake