Update the inspection schema

[snakedye]

The inspection schema should reflect the changes agreed upon in our metting.

New fields:

• guaranteed_analysis_title_fr
• guaranteed_analysis_title_en
• guaranteed_analysis_minimal

Old fields (delete):

• firstaid*

• micronutrients_*

• **ingredients*** (to confirm)_

• specification_*

• warranty_*

  Tasks:

  • [x] Update the schema.
  • [x] Update the expected.json
  • [x] #27

  Acceptance Criteria:

• All the tests should pass.

• The performance should be adequate.

[k-allagbe]

@Francois-Werbrouck please don't hesitate to give your insight here.

[k-allagbe]

Should this also take into consideration the "labelling option"?

Verbatim quote: "Le "labelling option" fait référence au fait qu'une compagnie peut choisir "la tenue de document" comme méthode à la place de lister les ingrédients. C'est une option légal, mais dans ce cas, aucun ingrédient ne sera listé. Les deux options devraient être "Tenue de document" ou "Matière actives dérivées de :". À CONSULTER POUR LA NOMENCLATURE SELON L'OPINION DE D'AUTRES EXPERTS."

Note: "tenue de document" could be "record keeping" in English.

[snakedye]

@k-allagbe We need a clear idea of what it would look like and what information to expect.

I think it's better to clear this up in a different issue.

What do you think? @Francois-Werbrouck

[k-allagbe]

@k-allagbe We need a clear idea of what it would look like and what information to expect.

I think it's better to clear this up in a different issue.

What do you think? @Francois-Werbrouck

I thought so too. Here: https://github.com/ai-cfia/fertiscan-pipeline/issues/28