Closed azhe825 closed 8 years ago
ONE repeat result. Each one stop at 90% retrieval rate.
Hall <= 2007 | Hall > 2007 | |
---|---|---|
Initial Size | 4846 | 4066 |
Final Size | 55 | 51 |
So reuse may not be a great idea.
Hall <= 2007 | Hall > 2007 | |
---|---|---|
Initial Size | 4846 | 4066 |
Final Size | 55 | 51 |
Continuous updating:
Start from beginning:
Reuse model:
Start from beginning:
UPDATE has great result. REUSE can reduce variance.
Relevant, recent work: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2961111.2962630
will include the paper for reference, a great one to justify the need to update SLR.
Not sure if this is the best spot to put this, but: http://www.win.tue.nl/~aserebre/SCAM2016.pdf
Discusses the need for both SLR and snowballing
This is cool~
Motivation:
As in RQ6, the need of continuous updating SLR is identified in:
Carver, Jeffrey C., Edgar Hassler, Elis Hernandes, and Nicholas A. Kraft. "Identifying barriers to the systematic literature review process." In 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 203-212. IEEE, 2013.
Another possible need is to reuse SLR, also identified in the above paper. The goal is to speed up the random selection process for one SLR by applying a model from another similar SLR, e. g., apply the model from Hall to Wahono to speed up the initial seed collection.
Two goals, two solutions