to demonstrate that SBSE and SA are the same, yu really need the same subheadings in both sections of 3.1 and 3.2
currently you have in 3.1
data collection
represetation
fintess function
operators
and
data collection
clustering
pruning
learner selection and parameter tuning
now isnt operators analagous to learner selection and parameter tuning? can't you unify the headings?
more generally, later in the paper you talk about problem domain problem challenge strategy in your back sections. if those are the terms that drive your examples at back, should not they be the terminology used in the front section in 3.1, 3.2?
even more general than that, what are the other opportunities in this paper to unify the terminology in this paper? not N headings, but M ≪ N headings,
to demonstrate that SBSE and SA are the same, yu really need the same subheadings in both sections of 3.1 and 3.2
currently you have in 3.1
and
now isnt
operators
analagous tolearner selection and parameter tuning
? can't you unify the headings?more generally, later in the paper you talk about problem domain problem challenge strategy in your back sections. if those are the terms that drive your examples at back, should not they be the terminology used in the front section in 3.1, 3.2?
even more general than that, what are the other opportunities in this paper to unify the terminology in this paper? not
N
headings, butM
≪N
headings,