Closed realhonbo closed 5 months ago
For the official case, I just did two simple tests below:
they got a similar path
sample_points
: quick-informed-rrt is 1500, informed-rrt is 5000
both sample_max_d
and optimization_r
are set to 50.0
time costs: informed-rrt is 1372ms, quick-informed-rrt is 236ms
more test data is needed !
@realHarvey
Thanks for your contribution, we will review the code later. Could you please provide the paper about quick-informed-rrt-star
?
For the official case, I just did two simple tests below: they got a similar path
sample_points
: quick-informed-rrt is 1500, informed-rrt is 5000 bothsample_max_d
andoptimization_r
are set to50.0
time costs: quick-informed-rrt is 1372ms, informed-rrt is 236msmore test data is needed !
@realHarvey , why does the time cost of Quick-Informed-RRT turn out to be much higher than that of Informed-RRT? How does the QUICK aspect manifest itself?
@realHarvey
Thanks for your contribution, we will review the code later. Could you please provide the paper about
quick-informed-rrt-star
?
Im sorry about that,there is no paper anymore. Its just a part of my graduate article
In some cases, developers cannot link Python to Python3,for example, when using ORB_SLAM2, explicitly using Python3 will not cause any errors.
another issue is that: there is only a slight difference between the paths generated by RRT* and RRT , caused by this code