Note: We demonstrated running code in notebooks to verify functionality
FRQ #
Comments
Score
1
Code runs as expected and FRQ type correctly identified
1.0/0.9
2
Code runs as expected, type is Methods and Control Structures
0.9/0.9
3
Code runs as expected and FRQ type correctly identified
1.0/0.9
4
Code runs as expected, FRQ type correctly identified, and additional code for clarity in output
1.1/0.9
Overall
Combined score for 1.1 scale FRQs
4.0/3.6
Association Comments:
I think that your reflection is very insightful and clearly shows the learning you have gained from doing the FRQs. The fact that you had most of the elements from the FRQs in your project is also a great demonstrator of the power of PBL as an educational method.
For your FRQ 3 response, I understand that SparseArrays are pretty uncommon (I did not use one either), but you could have still related the problem to Methods and Control Structures. However, I do appreciate the inclusion of how you could include SparseArrays specifically.
I would like to further highlight your future plans, as writing out your next steps is an excellent way to solidify learning and prove that what you did was actually meaningful.
Association Score:
Overall, I would give you a 3.9/3.6 for your FRQ Association.
Note: We demonstrated running code in notebooks to verify functionality
FRQ #
Comments
Score
1
Code runs as expected and FRQ type correctly identified, bonus methods
1.1/0.9
2
Code runs as expected and FRQ type correctly identified , bonus methods
1.1/0.9
3
Code runs as expected and FRQ type correctly identified
0.9/0.9
4
Code runs as expected and FRQ type correctly identified
0.9/0.9
Overall
Combined score for 1.1 scale FRQs
4.0/3.6
Association Comments:
I appreciate including the context of the problem in your associations to give a brief summary for people who did not do the problems (Mr. Mort). I particularly liked how you took note of not only similarities but also the differences between the problems and your project, which shows a strong understanding of the content and more.
One suggestion I have to make this association really stand out is to add an overall reflection with your future plans regarding the course. Overall, great job. ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
Association Score:
Overall, I would give you a 3.6/3.6 for your FRQ Association and 10 Gold Stars!
Crossover Reviews Reflection
Grading
I feel that I graded as fairly as I could, especially dealing with clear cheating on the assignment, as I consulted Mr. Mortensen on how to handle that situation
Overall I think grading on 1.1 is a little crazy
Learning
Seeing different approaches to problems is useful for learning new methods
i.e. StringBuilder (did not know that existed)
This was useful to see the capabilities of other people in the class to prepare for 12 person teams (I see that Vinay has a decent work ethic and teamwork skills)
Future Plans
Suggested to do more FRQs for learning and solidifying syntax
Future project will be decided upon after finding new members for the team
Me and Drew are scouting for prospects...
I am very, very excited to work with larger teams!
Quick Access
2015 FRQs (Personal Scores)
Total Score: FRQs + Reflection = 3.8 + 3.6 = 7.4/6.8
Crossover Reviews - Vinay
2015 FRQ Scores
Original comment linked here
Association Comments:
I think that your reflection is very insightful and clearly shows the learning you have gained from doing the FRQs. The fact that you had most of the elements from the FRQs in your project is also a great demonstrator of the power of PBL as an educational method.
For your FRQ 3 response, I understand that SparseArrays are pretty uncommon (I did not use one either), but you could have still related the problem to Methods and Control Structures. However, I do appreciate the inclusion of how you could include SparseArrays specifically.
I would like to further highlight your future plans, as writing out your next steps is an excellent way to solidify learning and prove that what you did was actually meaningful.
Association Score:
Overall, I would give you a 3.9/3.6 for your FRQ Association.
Crossover Reviews - Quinn
2015 FRQ Scores
Original comment linked here
Association Comments:
No submission
Association Score:
No submission, 1.8/3.6
Crossover Reviews - Adi
2015 FRQ Scores
Original comment linked here
Association Comments:
I appreciate including the context of the problem in your associations to give a brief summary for people who did not do the problems (Mr. Mort). I particularly liked how you took note of not only similarities but also the differences between the problems and your project, which shows a strong understanding of the content and more.
One suggestion I have to make this association really stand out is to add an overall reflection with your future plans regarding the course. Overall, great job. ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
Association Score:
Overall, I would give you a 3.6/3.6 for your FRQ Association and 10 Gold Stars!
Crossover Reviews Reflection
Grading
Learning
Future Plans