brimwats1
commented
2 years ago This happens with folder-note-core enabled but alx-folder-note disabled.
I also get about 4000 warnings in the log that look like:
getFolderPath(tbasename: "QuickAdd"deleted: falseextension: "md"name: "QuickAdd.md"parent: t {deleted: false, vault: t, path: "/", name: "", children: Array(10)}path: "QuickAdd.md"saving: falsestat: {ctime: 1634975230244, mtime: 1638123400523, size: 1997}unsafeCachedData: "---\nMetadata: \nfileClass: Meta\nMetaType: PKB\nCreated: 2021-10-23 00:47:10\nLast Modified: 2021-10-28 01:43:05\n---\n# QuickAdd\n\n- 1635613559: \n- 1635613560: \n- 2021-10-30 10;12:02: test\n- 2021-10-31 03:39:54: test\n- 2021-11-06 17:21:[second - \n\n- 2021-11-06 17:24:34 - \n- 2021-11-06 17:26:14: \n- 2021-11-06 17:27:44: ---\nhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29135559\n\nbarrenko 1 hour ago | root | parent | prev | next [–]\n\nSo next question, is a credit card chip also a computer?\nreply\n\n\t\nPeterisP 1 hour ago | root | parent | next [–]\n\nYes, a very limited one but you can put a bunch of interesting things there, the EMV standard documents how other apps should be put there so that the customer can have a card that works both as a credit card in CC terminals and also have additional features that are accessible either in specialized terminals or custom CC terminals with explicit support enabled e.g. some loyalty card or discount scheme.\nHere's a list (IMHO not exhaustive) of some apps put on EMV cards https://www.eftlab.com/knowledge-base/211-emv-aid-rid-pix/ - there are various identity card solutions both from governments and companies like Microsoft, there's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP_card , there's various solutions for store loyalty cards.\n\nHowever, I don't consider this aspect as any risk to the user, since when using the standard payment card functionality your card payments already have no privacy or security whatsoever from the issuer of your card, from a technical perspective the issuer will (by design) see and manage (authorize, revoke, etc) all the transactions and the card + terminal is just one of the channels for sending cardholder-initiated transactions to them. It would be technically appropriate to treat it not as \"your card\" but \"issuer's card\" that the cardholder uses as a token to use when the merchant communicates with the issuer about the bill.\n---\nby making technology masculine did it also make the classification systems masculine? \n"vault: t {_: {…}, fileMap: {…}, config: {…}, writingConfig: false, configDir: ".obsidian", …}__proto__: e): note name invaild
terminal reports
I've been trying to fix this for days and keep thinking it's fixed to come back and find it deleted. sometimes it will delete on one device and then other devices delete it. It's only this one and only since I renamed it