Student

[GabrieleMeoni]

Description

Summary of changes

• Merging students' contributions (cleaned by me) to main.

Resolved Issues

• Issue #201
• Issue #197
• Issue #196
• Issue #193
• Issue #191
• Issue #190

How Has This Been Tested?

Refer to the specific tests included in the PR. Issue #207 shall be taken into account in a separate PR.

[review-notebook-app[bot]]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[github-actions[bot]]

Coverage Report

File	Stmts	Miss	Cover	Missing
paseos
__init__.py	33	1	97%	49
paseos.py	148	12	92%	67–68, 145–146, 213, 228, 246, 255, 273, 304, 312–315
paseos/activities
activity_manager.py	43	3	93%	46, 74, 157
activity_processor.py	58	1	98%	121
activity_runner.py	62	10	84%	80–84, 104–113, 122–125
paseos/actors
actor_builder.py	223	33	85%	24–30, 33, 223–225, 252–254, 299–308, 339, 345, 493, 572–573, 588, 624, 671, 702, 714–718, 725–726, 733–734
base_actor.py	135	18	87%	85, 107, 123, 188, 228–230, 251, 260, 277, 298, 304–307, 313, 328, 383
ground_station_actor.py	15	3	80%	47–53
spacecraft_actor.py	108	14	87%	65–71, 79–85, 93–99, 198, 253, 262–265
spacecraft_body_model.py	52	4	92%	54, 89, 142, 157
paseos/attitude
attitude_model.py	89	2	98%	159, 168
disturbance_torques_utils.py	69	49	29%	46–222
paseos/central_body
central_body.py	73	6	92%	70, 179–180, 188–189, 258
is_in_line_of_sight.py	58	17	71%	106–123, 167, 174–187
mesh_between_points.py	35	2	94%	71, 79
sphere_between_points.py	26	8	69%	35–38, 48–51, 63–64
paseos/communication
find_next_window.py	20	15	25%	29–60
get_communication_window.py	23	18	22%	35–66
paseos/power
charge_model.py	16	1	94%	49
discharge_model.py	7	2	71%	22, 34
paseos/tests
activity_test.py	57	3	95%	90, 93–94
attitude_test.py	68	33	51%	93–129, 137–166
eclipse_test.py	10	1	90%	20
import_test.py	6	1	83%	13
init_test.py	8	1	88%	16
line_of_sight_test.py	62	4	94%	143–146
mesh_test.py	119	3	97%	118, 139, 147
thermal_model_test.py	30	1	97%	61
visualization_test.py	18	1	94%	28
paseos/utils
check_cfg.py	61	18	70%	31, 40, 46, 60–62, 67, 70–72, 75–77, 80–82, 98, 103
operations_monitor.py	71	3	96%	127–130
reference_frame_transfer.py	72	8	89%	108, 132, 240–242, 245–247
paseos/visualization
animation.py	18	6	67%	27–30, 35, 44
plot.py	9	3	67%	29–32
space_animation.py	215	23	89%	108–109, 124, 153–154, 188, 212–219, 225, 335, 358–360, 365, 374–375, 379, 415, 421–422, 453, 467–478
TOTAL	2655	328	88%

Tests	Skipped	Failures	Errors	Time
38	0 :zzz:	0 :x:	0 :fire:	1m 6s :stopwatch:

[GabrieleMeoni]

Issue #207 shall be taken into account in a separate PR.

[gomezzz]

@rasmusmarak this is the work @GabrieleMeoni was mentioning in our call. Maybe, a good first step for you could be to create a small example notebook branching out of this to try out if you can compute the point on Earth's surface that a satelliteActor is pointing at? Ideally any problems and questions that arise during that can also be used in this PR as feedback. (Maybe @GabrieleMeoni could start by just adding a few sentences to the readme on how to use this to enable this?)

[ghost]

@rasmusmarak this is the work @GabrieleMeoni was mentioning in our call. Maybe, a good first step for you could be to create a small example notebook branching out of this to try out if you can compute the point on Earth's surface that a satelliteActor is pointing at? Ideally any problems and questions that arise during that can also be used in this PR as feedback. (Maybe @GabrieleMeoni could start by just adding a few sentences to the readme on how to use this to enable this?)

Sounds like a good start, I'll make sure to have a look at some initial notebook example! :-)