Closed superstar54 closed 5 months ago
I think this will need some discussion, since it would be a breaking change?
Now it has backward capacity. I agree we need more discussion on it.
Thanks @superstar54. Can you take a look at the failing tests? Looks like the failures might not be related to this PR, but should be fixed regardless.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 96.21%. Comparing base (
826ad43
) to head (763d84e
). Report is 3 commits behind head on master.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The failed test is caused by a update in the template in aiida-resource-registry
repo, which add a new version
field.
I fixed it.
@superstar54 thank you for fixing the test. Could you please make a separate PR with that fix? I assume the test failures would pop up on other PRs as well?
Does this PR need to be merged for 2.1.0 version?
The only thing missing here is a unit test for the new behaviour.
Hi @danielhollas , I added a unit test for this behavior. Could you please have a look?
Fix #540 , use
process_type
as the node viewer's key.Here is an example, https://github.com/aiidalab/aiidalab-qe/pull/559