Open chrisjsewell opened 3 years ago
Certainly agree on changing the name.
I proposed aiida-webapi
but I think it's not very inspired. Since renaming should just be a search & replace operation and there is no rush, I suggest we wait a little bit and see whether a better idea comes along.
Instead of describing what the package is, a name could also relate to what one can do with it.
a name could also relate to what one can do with it
yeh this is why I felt aiida-webserver
might be better, since the purpose is to serve aiida over the web. I think webapi
might be a bit unclear to folk that don't know what a web API is
Now that I've snuck in the initial GraphQL implementation (#17) 😄, it's a bit of a misnomer to call this just restapi. Possible names:
aiida-webserver
,aiida-webapi
@ltalirz @NinadBhat ?