Closed normarivano closed 4 years ago
First, ASE is a fundamental and basic package for AiiDA - so it actually makes a lot of sense to request the dependency, no matter how many times it is explicitly used in W90. I mean try to do anything in AiiDA that involves a crystal structure, 90% you use ASE so... Second, if something works and it is clean code I would not change it for personal aesthetic reason - I mean if you have spare time to devote to the plugin, I would focus on documentation and testing, rather than reinventing the wheel. The line of the code you mention just uses ASE export function to xsf, why do you want to reimplement that?
The cause for the pylint
issue is that aiida-core
installs ase
only when the atomic_tools
extra is specified, and aiida-wannier90
doesn't have the dependency specified.
I agree with @AntimoMarrazzo that it's very likely ASE will be installed anyway, so as far as I'm concerned we can just put it in install_requires
.
When running tests pylint complains due to the uninstalled ase. `aiida_wannier90/utils.py
Line: 10
Maybe it´s overkill to have a dependence on ase only for the
a = structure.get_ase()
function. We could implement an xsf and remove ase.