Closed deanrp2 closed 3 years ago
One (of the many) ways this can be fixed by a careful search and replace to:
if not (seed is None):
random.seed(seed)
np.random.seed(seed)
I can address this, if you'd like me to, can you try assigning it to me? I think you should be able to assign issues to any github users.
@deanrp2 Thank you, that's actually a good catch, as it seems if statement will skip zero. I fixed that and it should show up in the next push after I made some adjustments to other classes to return latest population to test all in one go.
In at least WOA, the seed is being set with:
if the user chooses the seed to be 0, no seed will be set. I feel that this is unexpected behavior.