SimpleMemoryBackend - set max size

[rspadim]

When using SimpleMemoryBackend, should be important set the max size of internal dict

an idea is use an algorithm to select what to do when dict is "full", remove last element, first, random, rlu ...

[rspadim]

This could help:

https://cachetools.readthedocs.io/en/stable/

https://github.com/hephex/asyncache/blob/master/asyncache/__init__.py

[prochanev-thw]

We have any problems with alru_cache while this feature not implemented?

[sergioave]

Any progress or implementation schedule? Thank you

[Dreamsorcerer]

Feel free to make a PR implementing it.

[Yiling-J]

Consider using Theine as the backend when you decide to implement it. Which is much faster than cachetools.

[Dreamsorcerer]

Probably better if someone can create an external backend for theine (or even include it in theine itself, if they're intersted), rather than adding more dependencies here.

We can link to it in the README as an alternative backend if someone sorts that out.

[mirandadam]

Hi @Dreamsorcerer, I have submitted an incomplete PR to address this. Proper unit tests are needed and I have no idea how to implement them. Please advise.

[Yiling-J]

Actually I'm thinking, async-lru is also an aio-libs project, maybe it's possible to combine these two and use async-lru as the SimpleMemoryBackend? Theine is a little heavy because it has a Rust core(and maybe not that simple).

[Dreamsorcerer]

I didn't even know we had that library. :P If it's easy to drop-in, then I think that looks like a good solution. Ideally, we could make it an optional dependency.

[JPena-code]

Hi, I see that this issue is still open and I wonder. Do you think this feature is still required? Or is preferred to implement the external backend or the max size feature

[Dreamsorcerer]

If it's easy to make async-lru an optional dependency, then I'm happy to put that in. If you want to use theine (which maybe has better performance?), then it should be implemented as an external backend (again, happy to maintain a list to external backends in the README).

[JPena-code]

Hi@Dreamsorcerer, I ran some benchmarks to test the performance of both packages, using the three cache policies that theine supports, against the lru cache provied by async-lru and the sample data were random values from a zipf and uniform distribution, Fell free to give me any advice.

[Dreamsorcerer]

Still the same response. The only reason I think we should consider supporting async-lru as a built-in is because it's a library we also maintain, so any issue we can fix ourselves.

So, I think for any other backends, they should be implemented as additional libraries (or a class included within the related library) and maintenance to keep the backend working correctly can be handled there. We can then maintain a list of external backends from here. (I've made this suggestion before for other backends: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiocache/issues/495#issuecomment-1368573174)

It's up to you which option you'd like to work on, a new library with theine (or see if they'll take a PR to add to their adapters: https://github.com/Yiling-J/theine/tree/main/theine/adapters), or add async-lru here.

[mcpate]

If it's easy to make async-lru an optional dependency, then I'm happy to put that in.

@Dreamsorcerer, could you elaborate a little more on the above? What, roughly, would making async-lru an optional dependency look like? "Max size" is a feature I would love to see as well, and I would be happy to work on this (my thought was doing this directly in the SimpleMemoryBackend).

[Dreamsorcerer]

Well, some approach that will keep all the current features available without installing async-lru. I haven't really thought about it, but you could have the parameter check if the library is available and raise a RuntimeError if not, for example.