Closed maxheld83 closed 9 years ago
There's a little inconsistency here:
When it reorders (as it does by default) as per #263, principal::psych retains the original column names, as in:
principal::psych
pca.results <- principal(r = cor.data, nfactors = nfactors, rotate = rotation, n.obs = nrow(dataset), covar = FALSE) loa <- as.data.frame(unclass(pca.results$loadings)) #PCA from {psych} for factor loadings loa
yields:
PC2 PC1 PC3 US1 0.19090031 0.76583098 -0.16829944 US2 -0.06552370 0.82578471 0.10674419 US3 0.81073850 -0.01642114 -0.09294327 US4 0.77564922 0.22983558 0.27115532 JP5 -0.83345268 0.15438190 0.02554101 CA6 0.14605752 -0.18452178 0.88487489 UK7 0.14131112 -0.34862230 0.73900317 US8 -0.08906645 0.66252588 -0.17048799 FR9 0.20377209 -0.18284105 -0.44813857
notice, however, that qmethod then re-assigns names, irrespective of this turning around in principal::psych:
qmethod
colnames(loa) <- paste0("f", 1:ncol(loa)) loa
f1 f2 f3 US1 0.19090031 0.76583098 -0.16829944 US2 -0.06552370 0.82578471 0.10674419 US3 0.81073850 -0.01642114 -0.09294327 US4 0.77564922 0.22983558 0.27115532 JP5 -0.83345268 0.15438190 0.02554101 CA6 0.14605752 -0.18452178 0.88487489 UK7 0.14131112 -0.34862230 0.73900317 US8 -0.08906645 0.66252588 -0.17048799 FR9 0.20377209 -0.18284105 -0.44813857
That's a little confusing, especially because f1 etc is the same naming if the results are not rotated.
f1
I think we really need to get around to streamlining the "factor"-naming conventions as per #264
in the meantime, this is a "bug" (eh, more of an inconsistency) that I think we won't fix if reorder = TRUE, just to preserve backwards compatibility.
reorder = TRUE
If reorder = FALSE, the problem goes away anyway
reorder = FALSE
There's a little inconsistency here:
When it reorders (as it does by default) as per #263,
principal::psych
retains the original column names, as in:yields:
notice, however, that
qmethod
then re-assigns names, irrespective of this turning around inprincipal::psych
:yields:
That's a little confusing, especially because
f1
etc is the same naming if the results are not rotated.I think we really need to get around to streamlining the "factor"-naming conventions as per #264