Closed JackFroster closed 1 year ago
Hi, after rechecking the source codes, we have found that we have committed wrong version of the network. We have updated a correct one. Thank you for pointing out and sorry for the inconvenience.
Hi, after rechecking the source codes, we have found that we have committed wrong version of the network. We have updated a correct one. Thank you for pointing out and sorry for the inconvenience.
Thanks for your answer. I went over the code you submitted again. I found that the latest code still does not match the network structure in the paper.
For example, in the ResBlock section, do you need "torch.add()"? Is "FC" executed after Aggregation?😏
Hi, The committed network is the latest one that includes modifications after considering the recommendations of reviewers about some unreasonable/no-need parts of the described network (the figure) which may sometime cause unstable behavior during learning and a longer time to converge. If you want the network at the writing time, I have tracked and uploaded it. Incase there are any problems with the network, just let me know. Thank you for your constructed comments. By the way, I keep two versions of the nets in the source codes. The figure for the modified version will be updated later.
Hi, AIOZ AI! Thanks for your great work.
I'm a little confused about some of the snippets in the code.
According to Fig 3 in the paper, Feature 1, Feature 2 and Feature 3 are not the output of ResBlock1, ResBlock2 and ResBlock3 respectively. However, the code is implemented like this.
def forward(self, inputs):
In this line of code("0.7self.fc(x6) + 0.1x3_1.mean() + 0.1x4_1.mean() + 0.1x6.mean()"), what is the basis for choosing the weights ?