Closed PengPeixi closed 3 years ago
Dear PengPeixi,
After reading your concern, I have cloned and re-run the codes by following all instructions in our git repo on two different hardware setups. (1) Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 CPU and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GPU 11Gb RAM. (2) AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core Processor CPU and Nvidia GeForce TITAN V GPU 12 Gb RAM.
The evaluation logs in the train set and the validate set, the pretrained models on PathVQA of both mentioned setups can be found in: (link) The testing result in the PathVQA test set is 48.96% in setup (1) and 48.23% in setup (2), respectively. The results in the test set still meet the claim in our previous issue response: the experimental error is approximately 1.58%. We hope that some comments of us in this issue can help: https://github.com/aioz-ai/MICCAI21_MMQ/issues/2
Thank you very much for your reply! I will try to change the initial seed. And when I unzip or open the zip file which is downloaded from the link you supply, some errors occur. Could you please upload the zip file again?
Thank you very much for your reply! I will try to change the initial seed. And when I unzip or open the zip file which is downloaded from the link you supply, some errors occur. Could you please upload the zip file again?
I have updated the zip file. You can download and use them.
Thank you very much for your generous help!
Hello! I have tried to run the command line "sh run_vqa_PathVQA.sh" and then run "sh run_test_PathVQA.sh", but the total accuracy is 46.6%. I have tried it for many times, but the total accuracy I get is always around 46.6%.Can you please tell me how can I get the total accuracy on 'MMQ + MEVF' which is 49.0%?