Closed MartinKalema closed 1 week ago
[!WARNING]
Rate limit exceeded
@MartinKalema has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review.
How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a6a6ab1577c87b734157dbad5a500562e4f400f and 89ed2a4717b1514ca3a31180dddba29831b41b53.
The aggregate_data
function in weather_data_utils.py
has been enhanced to improve data processing efficiency. Key changes include more precise handling of timestamps, refined averaging and summation, and clearer column naming conventions. These updates ensure more accurate and comprehensible weather data aggregation for improved analysis and reporting.
Files | Change Summary |
---|---|
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/weather_data_utils.py |
The aggregate_data function now includes refined handling of timestamps, optimized index setting, selective column resampling for averaging and summing, and improved column renaming for better clarity. |
In the code where data flows,
Improvements come and clarity shows.
Timestamps sync and columns rename,
For weather stations, never the same.
Data neat and errors few,
A smoother path for insights new.
🌦️🌟📊
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 30.29%. Comparing base (
474322b
) to head (89ed2a4
).
Hi @MartinKalema , thanks again. In the background through phone calls, Slack private DMs and emails, please mobilise your colleagues to review your recent PRs. Thanks!
WHAT DOES THIS PR DO?
This PR fixes the
aggregate_data
method to ensure compatibility with pandas 2.0 and above. The method now correctly handles non-numeric columns by excluding them from the resampling operation, which resolves theTypeError
encountered when trying to compute the mean of non-numeric data. It is also compatible with pandas 1.5.3 and runs error-free.CHANGES MADE
select_dtypes
.station_code
after resampling.WHY IS THIS PR NECESSARY?
In pandas 2.0 and above, the
aggregate_data
method fails with aTypeError
due to the presence of non-numeric data in the DataFrame when attempting to compute the mean. This PR addresses this issue by ensuring that only numeric columns are included in the resampling operation, allowing the method to function correctly with the latest versions of pandas. It also ensures backward compatibility with pandas 1.5.3, avoiding any errors.AIRFLOW LOGS
The
production
andstaging
environment seem to be using pandas 1.5.3, the following warning is logged:In pandas 2.0 and above, this results in a
TypeError
:HOW TO TEST. Run this code in a jupyter notebook.
Summary by CodeRabbit