Closed bcorrie closed 10 months ago
Changes as I think we discussed, @bussec I added three possible values, the three former types with a detection method of count, which is I think applicable for our use case. Can you add some other possibilities (and correct mine if in error).
I have the following: "gene_expression_count", "surface_protein_expression_count", "antigen_specific_receptor_expression_count".
@javh it's a nit, but all 3 are UMIs. Also, I'm not crazy about calling them "barcodes" instead of just surface_protein
or something. But I don't care enough to make an issue of it if others feel differently.
I now added "fluorescence_intensity" as the measured parameter and added _by_
as a human-readable separator between the property type and the detection method.
@scharch I agree with you. But, I we decided to make the field a combination of readout and method.
@bussec I'm good with those changes.
Redo of property_type fixes, with just property_type field but adding detection keywords to suggested strings.