Open schristley opened 9 months ago
+1 for an array of objects. Does anyone have a good ontology for link_type
terms? Should include both genetic as well as exposure relationships. I had a look at OBO, but could not find anything suitable...
I did find the FHHO but it does not have exposure relationships.
Did some more digging, and SNOMED CT has a rather comprehensive set of relations. If there wouldn't the issue that it is not available under an open license...
v2.0 consideration? I have added it for now - seems like a small change other than sorting out the relationship question.
The field name as plural suggests multiple, but the description is written as though single. Also the fact that it's a single text field suggests single. Though it seems like supporting multiple would be desirable, like linking both mother and father for genealogy. If the intent is multiple then I'd suggesting using the flexibility of JSON schema and make it an array of objects where each object contains the subject id and link type.