airr-knowledge / issues

Issues and project management for the AKC
0 stars 0 forks source link

Inventory and existing field alignment deliverable (1.1A) #1

Closed schristley closed 6 months ago

schristley commented 9 months ago

Aim 1.1A critical metrics: the proportion of entities and DEs accommodated in the semantic model and standards

bcorrie commented 8 months ago

Created a Consolidate Field Mapping file in Schema/Harmonization directory that has AIRR, IEDB, IRAD, and VDJBase columns - these need to be reviewed but it is a start.

This is based on @rvita and @bpeters42 AIRR-IEDB mapping (as per #4) with columns added.

bcorrie commented 8 months ago

Created a separate issue (#5) for mapping common fields.

bcorrie commented 8 months ago

I also created a separate issue (#6) for generating the ontologies that are being used.

rvita commented 8 months ago

AIRR_IEDB_maps_RV.xlsx

bpeters42 commented 8 months ago

Please do not use the sheet from Randi for anything but internal mapping, but rather: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kMmANqAhg2ujURdRnSZBV-R0KO5Rxv7h/edit#gid=460086649

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 3:57 PM rvita @.***> wrote:

AIRR_IEDB_maps_RV.xlsx https://github.com/airr-knowledge/issues/files/13048304/AIRR_IEDB_maps_RV.xlsx

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/airr-knowledge/issues/issues/1#issuecomment-1771813924, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJX2IQL37XLFNFAWJTAEX3YAGV6RAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5APRI72VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONZRHAYTGOJSGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Bjoern Peters Professor La Jolla Institute for Immunology 9420 Athena Circle La Jolla, CA 92037, USA Tel: 858/752-6914 Fax: 858/752-6987 http://www.liai.org/pages/faculty-peters

bpeters42 commented 8 months ago

I should read before I write: The sheet Randi sent is based on the IEDB export terms, which should be our gold standards. My apologies to all and specifically for Randi for not checking before complaining. This is exactly what should be used.

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 4:01 PM Bjoern Peters @.***> wrote:

Please do not use the sheet from Randi for anything but internal mapping, but rather:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kMmANqAhg2ujURdRnSZBV-R0KO5Rxv7h/edit#gid=460086649

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 3:57 PM rvita @.***> wrote:

AIRR_IEDB_maps_RV.xlsx https://github.com/airr-knowledge/issues/files/13048304/AIRR_IEDB_maps_RV.xlsx

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/airr-knowledge/issues/issues/1#issuecomment-1771813924, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJX2IQL37XLFNFAWJTAEX3YAGV6RAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5APRI72VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONZRHAYTGOJSGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Bjoern Peters Professor La Jolla Institute for Immunology 9420 Athena Circle La Jolla, CA 92037, USA Tel: 858/752-6914 Fax: 858/752-6987 http://www.liai.org/pages/faculty-peters

-- Bjoern Peters Professor La Jolla Institute for Immunology 9420 Athena Circle La Jolla, CA 92037, USA Tel: 858/752-6914 Fax: 858/752-6987 http://www.liai.org/pages/faculty-peters

bcorrie commented 8 months ago

@schristley based on discussion today, I think it might be better to move the last two items on the checklist above to become part of 1.1B (https://github.com/airr-knowledge/issues/milestone/6)

That way this milestone is mostly about documenting the inventory of our current repositories, which we are almost done, and move the gap analysis and new fields, objects, and ontologies to 1.1B.

Does that make sense?

schristley commented 8 months ago

@schristley based on discussion today, I think it might be better to move the last two items on the checklist above to become part of 1.1B (https://github.com/airr-knowledge/issues/milestone/6)

That way this milestone is mostly about documenting the inventory of our current repositories, which we are almost done, and move the gap analysis and new fields, objects, and ontologies to 1.1B.

Does that make sense?

I agree for #11. The last item of critical metrics I would leave here, but feel free to have a copy on the other deliverable. That really shouldn't be a bullet item at this point, plus we are still debating how best to record and track metrics #15

schristley commented 8 months ago

moved #11 to #9

schristley commented 6 months ago

gathering of critical metrics is moved to #15