Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
Thsi probably means allowing for the additional of a variety of different
online
address alternatives (e.g. Twitter URL, Facebook page, blogspot, etc.)
Original comment by clivemjo...@gmail.com
on 2 Apr 2010 at 10:58
Could this just be allowing more than one "web address" with a "description"
field?
Original comment by gglbwmn2...@gmail.com
on 7 May 2010 at 2:41
Yes ... that might be an easier way of doing that ...in fact, I am not sure
whether
a description field would be needed as the nature of the web addresses would
make it
self evident ... w.g. twitter.com/, facebook.com/, etc.
Maybe the current XML already allows for multiple web addresses and the issue
is
moot?
Original comment by clivemjo...@gmail.com
on 7 May 2010 at 4:17
This should be made explicit in the schema. And the schema should be expanded
to allow adding an unlimited number of links to social networks (as the
inevitably will come and go). The elements should be available at any level
(Agency, Site, Service, ServiceSite) and should not be forced into a URI format
as some of them are not (e.g. Twitter handle). If the "Website" or "URL"
element in the schema does not currently have a Definition or Name attribute,
it should be added and the documentation updated to indicate the field into
which the indication of which social media network it points to (Facebook,
Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, etc).
Original comment by bleeb...@gmail.com
on 9 Dec 2011 at 6:56
[deleted comment]
Votes were for making this change, and in version 3.1.
Original comment by e...@ejahn.net
on 17 Feb 2012 at 11:12
Neil, currently there is a "Note" element for URLs. Does this satisfy the
description requirement you mentioned for urls? I'll add a separate social
media type, that is is not necessarily a url.
Original comment by e...@ejahn.net
on 17 Feb 2012 at 11:19
Original comment by e...@ejahn.net
on 18 Feb 2012 at 1:38
per 3/22/2012 workgroup discussion, decided to rename Note to Description for
consistency and change from SocialMedia to more generic InternetResource with
urls only. A handle would have to then be part of the url.
Original comment by e...@ejahn.net
on 22 Mar 2012 at 7:31
also made it a top level type and part of Agency, Site, SiteService
Original comment by e...@ejahn.net
on 22 Mar 2012 at 7:36
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
clivemjo...@gmail.com
on 12 Feb 2010 at 4:42