Can this be expanded so that the Agency, Site, ServiceSite (and Service if we
can bring that into the schema) elements can have any of the other top-level
element as a child? This would remove a lot of assumptions built into the
schema about what can and cannot be in the Agency, Site and ServiceSite
elements.
For example, some clients want to put GeographicAreaServed information at the
Site level, rather than the ServiceSite level.
Anything that is prohibited by the AIRS standards should not be allowed (e.g.
taxonomy assignments at the Site level), but otherwise it should be allowed in
the schema.
This might also illuminate new areas of the AIRS standards and style guide that
should be better defined....e.g. perhaps GeographicAreaServed should not be
allowed at the Site level - but that should first be incorporated into the AIRS
standards and only then reflected in the AIRS XML Schema.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by e...@ejahn.net on 17 Feb 2012 at 3:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
e...@ejahn.net
on 17 Feb 2012 at 3:08