airsalliance / lov

AIRS Linked Open Vocabulary
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
6 stars 0 forks source link

Add vocabulary handling of linked taxonomy terms #62

Open eric-jahn opened 9 years ago

eric-jahn commented 9 years ago

Kathy Kelly, 2-1-1 Ontario, mentioned this requirement in the AIRS Networker

klambacher commented 7 years ago

Can you link to the thread or provide detail here Eric?

eric-jahn commented 7 years ago

Hi @klambacher, it was in the Linked Open Vocabulary Community within the Networker. Took me a while to remember this. Here you go: http://airsnetworker.airs.org/communities/community-home/digestviewer/viewthread?GroupId=985&MID=8601&CommunityKey=440346b4-4565-4dc6-a10f-801f2f041085&tab=digestviewer#bm0 Note to World, the Networker is a members-only forum, and I haven't yet asked for Kathy's approval to make this public, so I can't paste in here, but the idea is associating more than one taxonomy term to a service. Essentially, this would mean conveying taxonomy term associations to SiteServices more like tags, and less like a mutually exclusive association. The Linked Open Vocabulary does prohibit multiple taxonomy codes being associated with a SiteService, etc., so this is supported on a simple level in the model.