Problem description (if applicable)
As noted in https://review.opendev.org/c/airship/sip/+/786306 for the loadBalancerWorker service the nodePort field is now ignored, since nodePortRange field is used instead. The nodePort field is inherited from the base service type. We need to refactor the types to remove this.
Proposed change
Remove nodePort from the base service type, and include it only for the services that need it.
Problem description (if applicable) As noted in https://review.opendev.org/c/airship/sip/+/786306 for the loadBalancerWorker service the nodePort field is now ignored, since nodePortRange field is used instead. The nodePort field is inherited from the base service type. We need to refactor the types to remove this.
Proposed change Remove
nodePortfrom the base service type, and include it only for the services that need it.