Closed ajdamico closed 11 months ago
does it make sense to write this minimal reproducible example with svygini? probably the easiest for readers to understand unless there's a strong reason to show it with a different function..
this is a really nice explanation, thank you!
i feel like it'd be helpful for me if you prepared an illustrative example of the broader change?
so starting with any example design or dataset (for example: https://github.com/ajdamico/convey/blob/master/R/svygini.R#L33)
then pulling the contents of any of our functions/methods (for example: https://github.com/ajdamico/convey/blob/master/R/svygini.R#L109)
and (without removing the current steps) making the revised calculations side by side in the code
and finally printing the results both overall (which i believe does not change) and by subgroup (which does)?
(will this change affect replication designs?)
does what i'm asking make sense?
thanks!!