Sweep/add option for user submit questions tha

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@ajitesh123 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 21 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.

Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7caeba6665440c2cbad5f1c154de856f91e93fde and 0d20d35c666b5c023a6e55870c3d592c87f911df.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

    <style>
    .animated-emoji {
        display: inline-block;
        vertical-align: middle;
        margin-right: 10px;
    }
    .zoom-in-out {
        animation: zoom-in-out 2s infinite;
    }
    .pulse {
        animation: pulse 2s infinite;
    }
    .shake {
        animation: shake 2s infinite;
    }
    .flash {
        animation: flash 2s infinite;
    }
    @keyframes zoom-in-out {
        0%, 100% { transform: scale(1); }
        50% { transform: scale(1.2); }
    }
    @keyframes pulse {
        0%, 100% { opacity: 1; }
        50% { opacity: 0.5; }
    }
    @keyframes shake {
        0%, 100% { transform: translateX(0); }
        25% { transform: translateX(-5px); }
        75% { transform: translateX(5px); }
    }
    @keyframes flash {
        0%, 100% { opacity: 1; }
        50% { opacity: 0; }
    }
    </style>

PR Review Summary 🔍

The PR introduces a new feature that allows the user to provide their own questions to be included in the performance review generation process. This feature aims to make the review process more customizable and tailored to the user's specific needs. The changes made in the PR seem to be well-documented, and the Q&A provided helps to understand the motivation and implementation details of the new functionality.

Security Analysis

- The ability to accept user-provided questions introduces potential security risks, such as injection attacks (e.g., cross-site scripting) and data leaks. - To mitigate these risks, the application should implement proper input validation and sanitization to ensure that user-provided questions do not contain any malicious content or sensitive information. - Additionally, the application should consider limiting the types of questions that can be submitted or providing a predefined set of questions that the user can select from.

Test Coverage Analysis

- The PR does not include any new test cases to cover the functionality of accepting user-provided questions. - It is important to add comprehensive test cases to ensure that the new feature works as expected, including edge cases and potential security vulnerabilities. - The test coverage should include both unit tests and integration tests to verify the end-to-end functionality of the new feature.

Logical Error Analysis

- The changes made in the PR appear to be logically sound and do not introduce any obvious logical errors. - The new `generate_prompt` function correctly incorporates the user-provided questions into the prompt that is sent to the OpenAI API. - However, it is important to thoroughly review the code to ensure that there are no subtle logical issues or edge cases that could lead to unexpected behavior.

ajitesh123 / auto-review-ai