search

ajitesh123 / auto-review-ai

🚀 AI-Powered Performance Review Generator
https://perfor-ai.streamlit.app/
3 stars 1 forks source link

``` #79

Closed ajitesh123 closed 4 months ago

ajitesh123 commented 4 months ago

This pull request adds the ability for users to provide audio input for their performance reviews and self-reviews. Previously, users had to type their input, but now they can record their audio. The audio is converted from speech to text using the Whisper model on the Groq library, and the resulting text is used as input to the review generation process.

Main Changes:

archie-ai-code-generation[bot] commented 4 months ago

PR Review Summary 🔍

This PR adds the ability for users to provide audio input for their performance reviews and self-reviews. The key changes include:

  1. Integration of the streamlit-audiorec library to allow users to record audio input.
  2. Implementation of the convert_speech_to_text function using the Whisper model in the Groq library to convert the recorded audio to text.
  3. Updates to the ReviewRequest and SelfReviewRequest models to include an optional audio_review field.
  4. Modifications to the api_generate_review and api_generate_self_review endpoints to handle the case where an audio file is provided, converting the audio to text and using it as input to the review generation process.
🔒 Security analysis
- The use of the Groq library and the Whisper model for audio-to-text conversion appears to be a secure approach, as these are reputable and widely-used tools. - However, it's important to ensure that the API keys used for the Groq library are properly secured and not exposed in the codebase or client-side. - The handling of temporary files created during the audio-to-text conversion process should be carefully managed to avoid potential security vulnerabilities.
🧪 Test coverage analysis
- The PR introduces new functionality for handling audio input, which should be thoroughly tested to ensure the reliability and robustness of the audio-to-text conversion process. - Test cases should be added to cover edge cases, such as handling invalid or corrupted audio files, large audio files, and various audio quality scenarios. - The integration of the new functionality with the existing review generation process should also be tested to ensure that the overall system continues to work as expected.
⚡ Logical error analysis
- The logic for handling the case where an audio file is provided appears to be sound, with the `convert_speech_to_text` function being called and the resulting text being used as input to the review generation process. - However, it's important to ensure that the error handling and edge case management in the `convert_speech_to_text` function is robust, as any issues in this function could potentially impact the overall review generation process. - The integration of the audio input feature with the existing review generation logic should be carefully reviewed to ensure that there are no unintended consequences or logical errors introduced.
coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 months ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.