Closed Caraxi closed 2 years ago
Any updates?
This is implemented poorly imo, but I definitely like the idea of adding support for double wildcards.
out of curiosity, what is poor about it? I've never written c++ before so I just copied the existing settings that you wrote
Double '??' wildcards are for denoting nibble wildcards. A proper implementation should support single nibble wildcards as well e.g. 48 8? C6 ?8
. The way you implemented this is just to accept double '??' wildcards as a single '?'. I can give you a reference implementation of what I mean if you want to integrate it into this project.
Fair enough I guess. my use case doesn't support nibble wildcards so it's not a big deal to me, I'll just keep my fork
It was for a very specific purpose, it may not be useful to everyone but I figured I'd PR it anyway. The system I use the signatures with them only accepts double
??
, saving 10 seconds for every signature manually changing it was worth the time adding the option.