Closed brianmcmichael closed 1 year ago
Is this worth the added maintenance complexity and gas cost of an extra method?
I misinterpreted the gas cost, I thought that also decreased along with the contract size. Since there is no issue with contract size as of now we can leave this PR for future in case a need arises.
Per today's discussion, closing but leaving branch in-place in case we need to reduce contract size.
Description of change
High level
mayInteract
modifier contents into function to reduce deployment sizeDescription of bug or vulnerability and solution
Contract size
Pre Change
Post Change
Gas usage
Pre Change
Post Change